For gaming news, events and game chat
-
Istik
- Machinating Paranoiac
- Posts:3401
- Joined:Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:33 am
- Location:Tasmania
-
Contact:
GameSpot May See Mass Resignations Over Dismissal
Unread post
by Istik » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:51 pm
http://kotaku.com/gaming/gamespot-on-th ... 329822.php
Speaking with a Gamespot employee yesterday who asked not to be named for this story, we've learned that, despite the neutral nature of the Gamespot news item on the matter, the editorial staff is said to be "devastated, gutted and demoralized" over the removal of former editorial director Jeff Gerstmann. While the termination of Gerstmann, a respected fixture at Gamespot, was pitched to his remaining colleagues by management as a "mutual decision", it was anything but, we're told.
The confusion over the reasons for Gerstmann's termination, compounded with a lack of transparency from management has created a feeling of "irreconcilable despair" that may eventually lead to an exodus of Gamespot editorial staffers. "Our credibility," said the source, "is in ruins." Over the course of the previous days, a "large number of Gamespot editors" have expressed their intentions to leave. Tales of emotionally deflated peers, with no will to remain at the site, were numerous.
Unless cooler heads prevail or concerns are addressed, Gamespot could see "mass resignations", our source revealed.
The source also indicated that Larson's paraphrased assertion that "AAA titles deserve more attention" was not necessarily a hint that Gamespot's reviewers be more lenient to those titles. Instead, in light of some rather controversial review scores—for example, the 7.5 for Insomniac Games' Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction—the editorial team needed to be more conscious of accuracy and impact of its scores
-
Istik
- Machinating Paranoiac
- Posts:3401
- Joined:Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:33 am
- Location:Tasmania
-
Contact:
Unread post
by Istik » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:54 pm
http://valleywag.com/tech/jeff-gerstman ... 328775.php
there has been an increasing amount of pressure to allow the advertising teams to have more of a say in the editorial process; we've started having to give our sales team heads-ups when a game is getting a low score, for instance, so that they can let the advertisers know that before a review goes up. Other publishers have started giving us notes involving when our reviews can go up; if a game's getting a 9 or above, it can go up early; if not, it'll have to wait until after the game is on the shelves
-
A'Ton Sands
- Spandex Crusader
- Posts:1209
- Joined:Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:18 am
- Location:UK
Unread post
by A'Ton Sands » Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:10 am
Well, theres a surprise, hopefully the editorial staff will leave on mass.
In journalism, your reputation is everything, if a journalist stays on any review they publish will not be believed.
The advertising staff/department should have no input or connection to the editorial staff, or all sorts of pressure will be applied to make reviews more favorable.